COMPARATIVE DISCUSSION PAPER (2024)

SAE Institute Amsterdam

COMPARATIVE DISCUSSION PAPER

The negative perception of the Vietnam War as depicted
in the Music and Movie Industry

Ruggiero Zadra
5-AMS-506217
CMN4200.S1

07/06/20

Word Count: 2540

Declaration:

I hereby declare that this is my own work, and does not use anymaterials other than the cited sources and tools. All explanations that Icopied directly or in essence are marked as such. This work has not beenpreviously submitted.

Table ofContents Table ofContents 1

Introduction 2

The protestsong 3

Protest songsduring the Vietnam war 4

The anti-warmovie as a concept 13

The Vietnam Warin movies 15

Conclusion 19

Bibliography 21

Introduction

The VietnamWar has been a long-lasting, politically complicated war (1955-1975), causingtens of thousands of casualties on both sides. In its essence it was a clashbetween the Americancapitalist-democratic government on the one side and a North-Vietnamesecommunist government on the other hand, fought on the soils of South-Vietnam,with a civil war between the people of South-and North Vietnam. It is alsocalled the “first television war” as from the mid-sixties it could be largelyfollowed on that new medium. Most soldiers were the so-called “baby-boomers”,born right after World War II. The war evocated various powerful sentiments,initially pro-patrotic, in the end also fed by fear of communism, but alsoevocated a strong protest movement, especially by the numerous exponents of younggeneration and activists of the Civil Rights movement. As the war degeneratedand the casualties augmented and the war dragged on and on, the protest voicegrew louder and louder.

In thispaper a comparison will be made between the artistical expression of theseprotest voices against the Vietnam war in two creative media industries, namelythe American Music Industry and the American Movie Industry.
These will be put into the context ofthe Vietnam war.

Inconclusion, an analysis will be made where both creative media of expressionare compared based on the selected research. It has to be mentioned that in therestrictions of this paper, the latter can never meet with the richness,infinity and interest of the subject-matter. It might however be an excuse forthe slight excess of words that have been used in this paper….

The protest song

Music is one of the best media to consider how citizens feel about the societythey live in. One of the ways in which a musician can express themselves inthrough protest songs. These songs are usually written to be part of a movementfor cultural or political change, and to galvanize that movement by drawingpeople together, by inspiring them to take action or reflect.
The Cambridge dictionary defines the protest song as a “song that expressesdisapproval, usually about a political subject”. (Protest Song

| meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary, n.d.) In quoting Elizabeth Kizer, Amanda Carr-Wilcoxsondescribes protest music as:

“expressions of discontent that imply a need forchange, represent the needs of an individual or a special interest group, maybe adapted by and utilized as ideological statements of a social movement,whether it was the original intention or not, may inspire the creation of othermessages against the status quo, may be used to stimulate thought or reinforceand modify attitudes.” (Carr-Wilcoxson,2010)

Although the reasons for protest are many, this paper will primarily focus on waras a subject of protest.

Protest songs during the Vietnam war

Although the previous wars had been subject of songs, these songs were generallyanti-war songs, but rather patriotic songs, or resonated worries of parents andexpressed the longing for home.
The Vietnam War was a turning point, where the number of anti-war songs beganto outweigh the number of pro-war songs. (Tomlinson, n.d.)
According to Benjamin Tausig this was partly due to the massive rise in populationduring the 60’s. Most soldiers drafted to fight in the war were born during thebaby boom after WWII. By the 1960’s the number of students had grown considerably,and seventeen-year-olds made up the bulk of the army.
There was a “far larger pool[of protestors] than at any other [point] in history. (Hill, 2016)

Therise of the television in households in the 60’s also helped spreading the newsabout Vietnam with a different impact than radio and newspapers had done sofar. Being directly exposed to the cruel images of the war, American citizenshad become deeply affected by the images they saw. (Tomlinson, n.d.) As timewent by the initial support of the war from a majority of the Americans quicklyshifted toward ambivalence. Especially the younger generation was very alert onpolitical matters and was deeply suspicious of the government’s motives to goto war and its representation of the facts. Their suspicions were fuelled by thestories told by veterans who had already returned from the war. (Hill, 2016)

“Some of the first organized activities against the Vietnam War centered onthe singing of songs at concerts, in clubs, and on campuses,” notes thehistorian H. Bruce Franklin. (Bruc Franklin, 2006)
This coincided with the revival of folk music. Artists like Pete Seeger andWoodie Guthrie stood at the forefront of the early folk music revival scene.
Before the Vietnam was protest music was already widespread in response to theCivil Rights movement, addressing different issues such as labour rights ordiscrimination. College students were quick to adopt the folk music scene:

Folk songs told stories. Thousands of young people were drawn to thereflexive lyricism of the genre.” (Young, 2015)

Singer-songwriters like Joan Baez and Bob Dylan captured the mood on thecollege campuses and coffeehouses throughout the country with songs like “WeShall Overcome” and “With God On Our Side”, thus playing animportant role in conveying messages of empowerment and social awareness in atime of political uneasiness.



How many roads must a man walk down

Beforeyou call him a man?

Howmany seas must a white dove sail

Beforeshe sleeps in the sand?

Yes,'n' how many times must the cannon balls fly

Beforethey're forever banned?

Theanswer, my friend, is blowin' in the wind

Theanswer is blowin' in the wind (40)

It can be notedthat few of these early anti-war songs were explicitly about Vietnam. Even songsconceived for other purposes or love songs took on a whole new meaning in thecontext of the war showing the importance of standing up to illegitimate authorityand acting and expressing one’s own beliefs. One of these songs was Simon &Garfunkel’s Sound of Silence (1964):

And in the naked light I saw

Ten thousand people maybe more

People talking without speaking

People hearing without listening

People writing songs that voices never shared

No one dared

Disturb the sound of silence

By 1965 military presence in Vietnam had escalated and so had the anti-warmovement. People were deeply upset with the images of Operation Rolling Thunderwhich brought the war into the public eye even more than before.
Consequently, reflecting American opinion the popularity of many of the anti-warsongs soared, starting with Barry McGuire’s Eve of Destruction and Tom Paxton’sLyndon Told the Nation.

The eastern world, it is explodin',

Violence flarin', bullets loadin',

You're old enough to kill but not for votin',

You don't believe in war, but what's that gun you'retotin',

And even the Jordan river has bodies floatin',

But you tell me over and over and over again myfriend,

Ah, you don't believe we're on the eve of destruction.


By 1968 the protests further rose as young people were forced to conscript. A strikingexample addressing that subject is Country Joe’s and The Fish’s
“I-feel-like-Im-fixing-to-die-rag”:

And it's1, 2, 3

What are we fighting for?

Don't ask me, I don't give a damn

Next stop is Vietnam

And it's 5, 6, 7

Open up the pearly gates

Well, there ain't no time to wonder why

Whoopee!

We're all going to die

The song attempts to put blame for the war upon thepoliticians and leaders of the US military and upon the industry that makes itsmoney from war but not upon those who had to fight the war ... the soldiers. Itexpresses the thoughts of a person trapped in the military system and forced togo to war by something called "conscription". Conscription or the"draft" as it was called then was a system which picked young peopleand forced them into the military and into the war with the only other choicebeing jail or an attempt to "dodge the draft" for religious reasonsor physical or mental reasons. It was very hard to get out of the draft becauseso many people were being killed in the war that they would take just about anyone. The song attempts to address the horror of going to war with a darksarcastic form of humor called "GI humor" (McDonald, 2000)

Creedence Clearwater Revival’s Fortunate Son addressed the same topic, dedicatedto the poor youth who had to conscript, as opposed to those “born with asilver spoon in hand”.
Black artists from the Civil and Women’s Rights Movements, like Edwin Starr andJimi Hendrix joined the anti-war movement, uniting the country in protest againstthe government. (Hill, 2016) Many black musicians drew comparisons between thewar and the Civil Rights movement (Brummer, 2018), with songs like Matt Jones’s“Hell No!

I Ain’t Gonna Go!”

Up tight! That’s right!

I ain’t gonna go!

Hell no!

I ain’t goin’ to Vietnam

I ain’t dyin’ for Uncle Sam.

Towards the end of the 60’s - with the summer of love and Woodstock - andthe start of the 70’s more and more music was concentrated on the desire to endthe war, “preaching” about peace, love and safety and getting every one’s lovedones back home and to stop fighting over a cause that was not worth the deathsof thousands of innocent people. Examples are the Plastic Ono Band’s GivePeace a Chance (1961) and Marvin Gaye’s What’s Going On? (1971)

Father, father

We don't need to escalate

You see, war is not the answer

For only love can conquer hate

You know we've got to find a way

To bring some lovin' here today, oh oh oh

The protests peaked around 1970 during the Kent State demonstration, in whichfour students were killed by the Ohio State National Guard.(Brummer, 2018) Crosby,Still, Nash & Young released ‘Ohio’ (1970):

Gotta get down to it

Soldiers are gunningus down

Should have been donelong ago

What if you knew herand

Found her dead on theground?

How can you run whenyou know?

During the Vietnam War music played an important role as it was madeavailable massively to the soldiers in the rear off the battlefield to keep themorale up. Soldiers collectively listened to the same music as their peers backhome, including the politically critical, anti-war songs. The fact that thismusic was both very popular and widely shared gave its message a big politicalimpact. (Rothman, 2017)
The Animals’ We’ve Gotta Get Out of this Place (1965) resonatedparticularly with the US forces:

We had absolute unanimity is this song being the touchstone. This was theVietnam anthem. Every bad band that ever played in an armed forces club had toplay this song. (Mattmiller, 2006)


The legacy of Vietnam had a worldwide lasting impact on artists and songwriters.Years after the war had ended in 1974 artists of different genres andnationalities continued to mention the Vietnam war, like Sodom’s AgentOrange (1989), Alice in Chain’s Rooster (1992), and Bruce Springsteen’sBorn in the USA (1984):

“I don’t know if anybody could imagine what their

[America’s VietnamVeterans] particular experience is like. I don’t think I could, you know? Ithink you had to live through it. But when you think about all the young menand women that died in Vietnam, and how many died since they’ve been back –surviving the war and coming back and not surviving – you have to think that,at the time, the country took advantage of their selflessness. There was amoment when they were just really generous with their lives.” (Loder, 1984)



The anti-war movie as a concept

Since the invention of cinema, war has been a prominent topic in one way or theother. Themes explored in war films include combat, survivor and escapestories, tales of sacrifice and struggle, camaraderie between soldiers, studiesof the futility and of battle, the effects of war on society

.

At this point there is a point to be made whether such moviesare per definition anti-war, or if there’s a distinction to befound. Traditionally, an anti-warfilm aims to portray the horrors of armed conflict, and the mental and physicalharm it causes to soldiers and civilians. It could be argued that any movieabout war is an anti-war movie since any movie that realistically depicts warand combat scenes will invariably highlight the moral and human issues raisedby war. Philosophyprofessor Dennis Rothermel lists the random infliction of violent death, abjectterror, and heinousness as a norm of behavior – along with a sense of balance and context. (Brook, 2014) as necessary criteria for an anti-war film. A crucial aspectseems to be the ability to show both sides of the conflict while trying to engagethe viewer in a debate.
Conversely, many believe there is no difference between films about war in general,and films considered as “anti-war”:

“There’s no such thingas an anti-war film,” is a quote often attributed to the late French filmmakerFrançois Truffaut. There are different ways to interpret this remark but it’swidely agreed that Truffaut was suggesting that movies will inevitably glorifycombat when they portray the adventure and thrill of conflict – and thecamaraderie between soldiers. (Brook, 2014)Francis Ford Coppola states: An anti-war film [...] shouldn’thave sequences of violence that inspire a lust for violence. Apocalypse Now hasstirring scenes of helicopters attacking innocent people. That’s not anti-war.”(Perry, 2019)In short, there are many diverging opinions on what defines an anti-war movieand the question is indeed if such a concept really exists. From which perspectivea movie has been made, to the interpretation of the public, the criteria vary. However,one thing can be concluded, namely that as long as the author’s intention wasto be critical about (a) war and to depict its horrors, despite of what Coppolasays, it’s clear that such movies are generally considered as anti-war.

The Vietnam War in moviesOnly one majormovie was produced during the Vietnam War: John Wayne’s The Green Berets (1968).John Wayne was concerned about the rising anti-war sentiment within the U.S.and obtained assistance from the government, which granted Wayne the use ofmilitary props and locations but retained the right to make changes to thescript. This resulted in what is now widely regarded as one of the worst moviesever made about Vietnam, featuring heavy handed patriotism and unrealistic warscenes. (Tunzelmann, 2014)

It might be remarkable that other than “The Green Berets” only minor B movieswere made throughout the duration of the Vietnam War. In fact it was notearlier than the mid to end ‘70s that the first movies on ‘Nam’ were producedand released. But the Vietnam War was a turning point in how war films weremade and for what reason. Up to this point movies had shown America’s involvementin any war as necessary and, while filmmakers did show and condemn the brutalityof war, movies were usually permeated with a sense of patriotism and thefeeling of fighting the good fight.
In the U.S. however the Vietnam War was highly divisive, and while Nixondeclared that a Silent Majority was still in favour of the war (Nixon calls onthe “silent majority”, 2009), the Antiwar Movement grew bigger every day, withhippies, student protesters and ordinary American citizens denouncing the militarydraft and the senseless war. As the conflict escalated with no end in sight, sodid the protests, resulting in riots and police brutality.


Additionally the Vietnam War was one where the U.S. couldn’t claim a win at theend of it:


…many PCFs [prestige combat films, ed.] about Vietnam did the same, redirectingthe heroic narratives of the combat film, as forged during and after Word WarII, toward the telling of a war story that, in the case of Vietnam, ends infailure and defeat, a deeply ambiguous outcome for a nation as accustomed to victoryas the United States. (Decker, 2017)


Secondly, the 70’s marked the end of Hollywood’s monopoly over cinema, which ledto a growing independent film scene where filmmakers had the liberty to goagainst Hollywood and the government (Accomando, 2015), something that alwayscomplicated the release of anti-war movies:

The mere fact that a screenplay could be interpreted as anti-war can affect itschances of getting studio backing. Conservatives routinely criticise ‘liberalHollywood’ for making films with themes they perceive as anti-American andanti-military. So within the industry there can be a reluctance to take onanti-war projects – or produce films that could be construed as critiques ofcontemporary conflicts – lest they be seen as unpatriotic or demoralising forUS troops in harm’s way. (
Brook, 2014)

It was only after the Vietnam War had ended that the film industry acknowledgedwhat had happened in Vietnam, spawning a myriad of war movies such as “The DeerHunter” (1978) and “Casualties of War”(1989) focusing on the atrocities of warand the disillusionment many felt during this era. These movies saw anunprecedented use of realism and grittiness in portraying the violence. (Howell,2020) Oliver Stone’s “Platoon” (1986) and Kubrick’s “Full Metal Jacket” (1987)are widely seen as some of the best anti-war movies that depicted the insanityof war and were met with critical acclaim and received multiple nominations andawards.

Some films didn’t find place during the war but instead focussed on the mentalstate many soldiers found themselves in after returning from the war. Moviessuch as Hal Ashby’s “Coming Home” (1978) or Vietnam veteran Oliver Stone’s “Born on the 4th of July” (1989) highlightedthe different ways in which veterans processed their experiences on thebattlefield like the public had never seen before. (Accomando, 2015)
Other movies such as “Good Morning Vietnam” (1987) and “M*A*S*H*” (1970) tried insteadto satirize or at least use humour to deal with the subject.

However, one film stands out above all: Coppola’s Apocalypse Now (1979). Followinghis

two top-grossingand widely praised Godfather movies, Coppola got the freedom, the time, and an enormousbudget to create an epic work that depicted the war in such an infernal waylike no one had ever experienced before. (Dirks, 2020)


At the Cannes Film Festival in 1979, where the film was unveiled, directorFrancis Ford Coppola made this statement at a press conference: “My film is nota movie. My film is not about Vietnam. It is Vietnam. It’s what it was reallylike. It was crazy. And the way we made it was very much like the way theAmericans were in Vietnam. We were in the jungle. There were too many of us. Wehad access to too much money, too much equipment, and little by little, we wentinsane.” (Accomando, 2015)The movie narrates about U.S. Army officer Willard who is tasked withassassinating ex-Colonel Kurtz, who has gone rogue and has installed himself aswarlord in the jungle of Vietnam, ruling as a deity. Akin to Dante’s Inferno,the film chronicles a descent into madness without apparent reason. During hisjourney Willard is confronted with the horrors that have brought Kurtz to insanityand will start to resemble the ex-Colonel more and more.

The movie garnered enormous praise and received multiple awards and is considereda classic masterpiece. The movie has reached cult-status and is still actualtoday:

As Beth Accomando describes it: “The setting may be Vietnam but thediscussion of ideas about war, American involvement in foreign countries, andthe human capacity for evil are all still highly relevant.” (Accomando, 2015)

Conclusion

The Vietnam war was a complicated and messy era in the history of the U.S.,with an estimated death toll of one to three million fatalities. The war evokedstrong anti-government sentiments in the American population, which werereflected differently across various creative media, mainly by the youngergeneration and by proponents of the Civil Rights movement.

Especially music had the become the creative medium for cultural and politicalconflict and dialogue. While the U.S. had a long-practiced tradition of protest-music,the apex was reached during this war. Although the anti-war sentiments were inthe minority during the early 60’s, as the war intensified, likewise the explicitnessand amount of anti-war songs grew. Having started with left-wing folksingers,performing on campuses and bars, it evolved into a countrywide involvement ofartists of all genres and races. Music served as a consolation for the masses, butwas also meant as a wake-up call for the government.

Music also filled a void in the country’s media landscape. There were only buta handful of minor movies made during that period that criticised the war oreven addressed it, as Hollywood was hesitant to produce any movie that was opposedto the war, or otherwise not supportive of the establishment.
Of course this doesn’t have to mean directors weren’t critical of the war, butit wasn’t until years after the end of the war that they addressed these issues,
showing the cruelty of war in their full atrocity.
Up until then, the conservative environment of Hollywood didn’t account for thebig budget that is involved in producing a movie that might antagonize theaudience, as the political landscape was highly divided.

Contrarily to movies, music mirrors the era’s zeitgeist more directly and honestly,as the artists could express themselves more freely, not being bound bybudgetary constraints and already belonging to the anti-establishment.
According to Benjamin Tausig when it comes to protest songs, “you’re asimpolite as you’re allowed to be. (1).
Consequently, the artists covered the Vietnam War in every aspect, not onlyduring the war but also after, thus giving a voice to the individuals whowanted to make their anti-war feelings heard. As these songs were sung and performedcollectively, for instance at demonstrations, and shared with soldiers abroad,they had a lasting social and political impact. Movies made after the war aboutVietnam sought to include these songs to show the authenticity of the era butalso to make use of the incredible emotive power these songs had.


Bibliography

Accomando, B., 2015.TheVietnam War On Film. [online] KPBS Public Media. Available at:<https://www.kpbs.org/news/2015/apr/29/vietnam-war-film/> [Accessed 7June 2020].

Brook, T., 2014.IsThere Any Such Thing As An ‘Anti-War Film’?. [online] Bbc.com. Availableat:<https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20140710-can-a-film-be-truly-anti-war>[Accessed 7 June 2020].

Brummer, J., 2018.TheVietnam War: A History In Song | History Today. [online] Historytoday.com.Available at:<https://www.historytoday.com/miscellanies/vietnam-war-history-song>[Accessed 7 June 2020].

Carr-Wilcoxson, Amanda Marie,"Protest Music of the Vietnam War: Description and Classification ofVarious Protest Songs." (2010). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper1686. Available at: <https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1686> [Accessed 7 June 2020].

Chilton, M., 2015.AllQuiet On The Western Front, Film Review. [online] Telegraph.co.uk.Available at:<https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/filmreviews/11570461/All-Quiet-on-the-Western-Front-film-review.html>[Accessed 7 June 2020].

Decker, T., 2017.HymnsFor The Fallen: Combat Movie Music And Sound After Vietnam. California:University of California Press, p.12.

Dictionary.cambridge.org.n.d.PROTEST SONG | Meaning In The Cambridge English Dictionary.[online] Available at: <https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/protest-song>[Accessed 7 June 2020].

Dirks, T., 2020.ApocalypseNow (1979). [online] Filmsite.org. Available at:<https://www.filmsite.org/apoc.html> [Accessed 7 June 2020].

Dirks, T., 2020.WarAnd Anti-War Films. [online] Filmsite.org. Available at:<https://www.filmsite.org/warfilms.html> [Accessed 7 June 2020].

H. Bruce Franklin, VietnamWar in American Stories, Songs, and Poems (Boston: Bedford Books, 1996), p. 204

Henwood, B., 2017.The History Of AmericanProtest Music, From "Yankee Doodle" To Kendrick Lamar. [online]Vox. Available at:<https://www.vox.com/culture/2017/4/12/14462948/protest-music-history-america-trump-beyonce-dylan-misty>[Accessed 7 June 2020].

Hill, F., 2016.SongsOf War: The Evolution Of Protest Music In The United States - Harvard PoliticalReview. [online] Harvard Political Review. Available at:<https://harvardpolitics.com/covers/songs-of-war-the-evolution-of-protest-music-in-the-united-states/>[Accessed 7 June 2020].

HISTORY. 2009.NixonCalls On The “Silent Majority”. [online] Available at:<https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/nixon-calls-on-the-silent-majority>[Accessed 7 June 2020].

Howell, A., 2020.AmericanCinema After The War - Vietnam War - Film, Movie, Tv, Born, Music, Role, Story,Documentary. [online] Filmreference.com. Available at:<http://www.filmreference.com/encyclopedia/Romantic-Comedy-Yugoslavia/Vietnam-War-AMERICAN-CINEMA-AFTER-THE-WAR.html>[Accessed 7 June 2020].

Loc.gov. n.d.YankeeDoodle - Songs And Poetry- Lyrical Legacy | Teacher Resources - Library OfCongress. [online] Available at:<https://www.loc.gov/teachers/lyrical/songs/yankee_doodle.html> [Accessed7 June 2020].

Loder, K., 1984. The RollingStone Interview: Bruce Springsteen on ‘Born in the U.S.A.’.RollingStone, [online] Available at:<https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/the-rolling-stone-interview-bruce-springsteen-on-born-in-the-u-s-a-184690/>[Accessed 7 June 2020].

Mattmiller, B., 2006.‘WeGotta Get Out Of This Place:’ Music, Memory And The Vietnam War. [online]News.wisc.edu. Available at:<https://news.wisc.edu/we-gotta-get-out-of-this-place-music-memory-and-the-vietnam-war/>[Accessed 7 June 2020].

McDonald, J., 2000.CountryJoe Mcdonald, How I Wrote The Rag. [online] Countryjoe.com. Available at:<http://www.countryjoe.com/howrag.htm> [Accessed 7 June 2020].

Perry, K., 2019.FrancisFord Coppola: 'Apocalypse Now Is Not An Anti-War Film'. [online] theGuardian. Available at:<https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/aug/09/francis-ford-coppola-apocalypse-now-is-not-an-anti-war-film>[Accessed 7 June 2020].


Rothman, L., 2017.WhyThe Vietnam War Produced Such Iconic Music. [online] Time. Available at:<https://time.com/4949617/music-vietnam-war/> [Accessed 7 June 2020].


Scott, C., 2018.Stop! What’S That Sound: How The Vietnam War ChangedAmerican Music. [online] The Michigan Daily. Available at:<https://www.michigandaily.com/section/arts/stop-what%E2%80%99s-sound-how-vietnam-war-changed-american-music>[Accessed 7 June 2020].

Sklaroff, L., 2017.DuringVietnam War, Music Spoke To Both Sides Of A Divided Nation. [online] TheConversation. Available at:<https://theconversation.com/during-vietnam-war-music-spoke-to-both-sides-of-a-divided-nation-83702>[Accessed 7 June 2020].

Tomlinson, C., n.d.AMERICA’SCHANGING MIRROR: HOW POPULAR MUSIC REFLECTS PUBLIC OPINION DURING WARTIME.Campbell University.

Tunzelmann, A., 2014.TheGreen Berets: How The War Was Spun. [online] the Guardian. Available at:<https://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/jul/11/the-green-berets-reel-history-john-wayne-vietnam-war>[Accessed 7 June 2020].

Variety Staff, n.d.AllQuiet On The Western Front. [online] Variety. Available at:<https://variety.com/1930/fil

Young, R. 2015. Make love not war. Dissent: the history of an Americanidea. New York: NYU Press

Zimmerman, B., 2017.Opinion| The Four Stages Of The Antiwar Movement. [online] Nytimes.com. Availableat:<https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/24/opinion/vietnam-antiwar-movement.html>[Accessed 7 June 2020].


COMPARATIVE DISCUSSION PAPER (2024)

FAQs

Is 8 participants enough for qualitative research? ›

While some experts in qualitative research avoid the topic of “how many” interviews “are enough,” there is indeed variability in what is suggested as a minimum. An extremely large number of articles, book chapters, and books recommend guidance and suggest anywhere from 5 to 50 participants as adequate.

How many in depth interviews is enough? ›

Sample size guidelines suggested a range between 20 and 30 interviews to be adequate (Creswell, 1998). Interviewer and note taker agreed that thematic saturation, the point at which no new concepts emerge from subsequent interviews (Patton, 2002), was achieved following completion of 20 interviews.

What is the minimum sample size for qualitative interviewing? ›

Qualitative research in general

35) suggests that the smallest acceptable qualitative sample size is 15 interviews.

What is a good sample size in qualitative research? ›

Our general recommendation for in-depth interviews is a sample size of 30, if we're building a study that includes similar segments within the population. A minimum size can be 10 – but again, this assumes the population integrity in recruiting.

Is 20 respondents enough in quantitative research? ›

In most cases, we recommend 40 participants for quantitative studies.

Is it okay to have 10 respondents in research? ›

We generally recommend a panel size of 30 respondents for in-depth interviews if the study includes similar segments within the population. We suggest a minimum sample size of 10, but in this case, population integrity in recruiting is critical.

Is 10 respondents enough for qualitative research? ›

Actually the beauty of qualitative research is to find an answer for 'WHY' & on the other hand quantitative study would respond to 'WHAT', although views varies from researcher to researcher still at least 10 respondents in each category/sample is needed for qualitative study.

Is 15 participants enough for qualitative research? ›

Nevertheless, the “sweet spot” sample size for many qualitative research studies is 15 to 20 hom*ogeneous interview participants.

What is considered a large sample size in research? ›

A good maximum sample size is usually 10% as long as it does not exceed 1000. A good maximum sample size is usually around 10% of the population, as long as this does not exceed 1000. For example, in a population of 5000, 10% would be 500. In a population of 200,000, 10% would be 20,000.

Is 5 participants enough for qualitative research? ›

It's often a good idea (for qualitative research methods like interviews and usability tests) to start with 5 participants and then scale up by a further 5 based on how complicated the subject matter is.

Is 20 a good sample size for qualitative research? ›

Sample Size for Qualitative Studies

Need to ensure there is enough, but not too much, data (>30 too large; Boddy, 2016). One review identified that samples of 20 and 30 (and multiples of 10) were most common (Mason, 2010), with 25-30 being a typical recommendation (Dworkin, 2012).

What is considered a small sample size in research? ›

Although one researcher's “small” is another's large, when I refer to small sample sizes I mean studies that have typically between 5 and 30 users total—a size very common in usability studies.

Why is 30 the minimum sample size? ›

A sample size of 30 often increases the confidence interval of your population data set enough to warrant assertions against your findings. 4 The higher your sample size, the more likely the sample will be representative of your population set.

What is enough sample size? ›

For populations under 1,000, a minimum ratio of 30 percent (300 individuals) is advisable to ensure representativeness of the sample. For larger populations, such as a population of 10,000, a comparatively small minimum ratio of 10 percent (1,000) of individuals is required to ensure representativeness of the sample.

Why is a small sample size a limitation in research? ›

Sample size limitations

A small sample size may make it difficult to determine if a particular outcome is a true finding and in some cases a type II error may occur, i.e., the null hypothesis is incorrectly accepted and no difference between the study groups is reported.

Is 50 respondents enough for a survey? ›

A sample size consisting of 50-100 respondents will be sufficient for obtaining comprehensive behavioral insights during emotion measurement.

How do I know if my sample size is large enough? ›

Chi Square and the Large Enough Sample Condition

To know if your sample is large enough to use chi-square, you must check the Expected Counts Condition: if the counts in every cell is 5 or more, the cells meet the Expected Counts Condition and your sample is large enough.

Is 200 a good sample size? ›

As a general rule, sample sizes of 200 to 300 respondents provide an acceptable margin of error and fall before the point of diminishing returns.

What is a good amount of participants for a study? ›

When a study's aim is to investigate a correlational relationship, however, we recommend sampling between 500 and 1,000 people. More participants in a study will always be better, but these numbers are a useful rule of thumb for researchers seeking to find out how many participants they need to sample.

What is the best number of respondents when conducting a research? ›

Survey research generally accepts for quantitative studies, therefore, it is ideal to achieve a number of respondents exceeding 200. However, if you use PLS-SEM, this must be applied to 10 times rules. Nevertheless, in order to get a statistical significance, always better to go for at least 200 samples.

What is considered a good survey response rate? ›

So, what is a good survey response rate? Factors that impact this include, how engaged your customers are with your brand, and whether you're delivering surveys in a way that's easy for them. Nevertheless, a good survey response rate ranges between 5% and 30%. An excellent response rate is 50% or higher.

How many responses do I need for a survey to be valid? ›

As a very rough rule of thumb, 200 responses will provide fairly good survey accuracy under most assumptions and parameters of a survey project. 100 responses are probably needed even for marginally acceptable accuracy.

What is a good sample size for focus groups? ›

Population: The ideal size of a focus group is 8-10 subjects, plus a facilitator and a note taker, about the size of a lively seminar class. A larger group will limit the detail of some responses because participants feel a pressure to share airtime with others.

How do you justify small sample size in quantitative research? ›

In this overview article six approaches are discussed to justify the sample size in a quantitative empirical study: 1) collecting data from (almost) the entire population, 2) choosing a sample size based on resource constraints, 3) performing an a-priori power analysis, 4) planning for a desired accuracy, 5) using ...

How do you handle a small sample size? ›

Sampling. The most obvious strategy is simply to sample more of your population. Keep your survey open, contact more potential participants, or consider widening the population.

What sample size do I need for 95 confidence? ›

To be 95% confident that the true value of the estimate will be within 5 percentage points of 0.5, (that is, between the values of 0.45 and 0.55), the required sample size is 385. This is the number of actual responses needed to achieve the stated level of accuracy.

Does small sample size affect validity? ›

The answer to this is that an appropriate sample size is required for validity. If the sample size it too small, it will not yield valid results. An appropriate sample size can produce accuracy of results.

Does small sample size affect validity or reliability? ›

Appropriate sample sizes are critical for reliable, reproducible, and valid results. Evidence generated from small sample sizes is especially prone to error, both false negatives (type II errors) due to inadequate power and false positives (type I errors) due to biased samples.

Is 6 respondents enough for qualitative research? ›

Since Guest et al.'s publication in 2006, other researchers have confirmed that 6-12 interviews seem to be a sweet spot for the number of qualitative interviews needed to reach saturation.

How many interviews are enough in qualitative research? ›

The answer, as with all things qualitative, is “it depends.” It depends on your resources, how important the question is to the research, and even to how many respondents are enough to satisfy committee members for a dissertation. For many qualitative studies one respondent is all you need – your person of interest.

How do you justify the number of participants in a qualitative study? ›

In making a justification for an adopted sample size, qualitative researchers should make reference to the scope of the study and nature of the topic (Morse, 2000), the contact time to be spent on each individual research participant (respondent) (Marshall et al., 2013) and the hom*ogeneity of the population under ...

Why are there 5 participants in qualitative research? ›

That the probability of someone encountering an issue is 31%

Based on these assumptions, Jakob Nielsen and Tom Landauer built a mathematical model that shows that, by doing a qualitative test with 5 participants, you will identify 85% of the issues in an interface.

What happens if sample size is less than 30? ›

For example, when we are comparing the means of two populations, if the sample size is less than 30, then we use the t-test. If the sample size is greater than 30, then we use the z-test.

Does sample size matter in research? ›

The sample size for a study needs to be estimated at the time the study is proposed; too large a sample is unnecessary and unethical, and too small a sample is unscientific and also unethical. The necessary sample size can be calculated, using statistical software, based on certain assumptions.

Does larger sample size increase reliability? ›

Statistical importance of having a large sample size

Larger studies provide stronger and more reliable results because they have smaller margins of error and lower standards of deviation. (Standard deviation measures how spread out the data values are from the mean.

Is 20 a large enough sample size? ›

Often a sample size is considered “large enough” if it's greater than or equal to 30, but this number can vary a bit based on the underlying shape of the population distribution. In particular: If the population distribution is symmetric, sometimes a sample size as small as 15 is sufficient.

Is 30 people a good sample size? ›

“A minimum of 30 observations is sufficient to conduct significant statistics.” This is open to many interpretations of which the most fallible one is that the sample size of 30 is enough to trust your confidence interval.

Why must sample size be greater than 30? ›

Sample size equal to or greater than 30 are required for the central limit theorem to hold true. A sufficiently large sample can predict the parameters of a population such as the mean and standard deviation.

What are 3 factors that determine sample size? ›

In general, three or four factors must be known or estimated to calculate sample size: (1) the effect size (usually the difference between 2 groups); (2) the population standard deviation (for continuous data); (3) the desired power of the experiment to detect the postulated effect; and (4) the significance level.

How do you determine the number of samples needed? ›

Follow these steps to calculate the sample size needed for your survey or experiment:
  1. Determine the total population size. First, you need to determine the total number of your target demographic. ...
  2. Decide on a margin of error. ...
  3. Choose a confidence level. ...
  4. Pick a standard of deviation. ...
  5. Complete the calculation.

Why is sample size important in research? ›

What is sample size and why is it important? Sample size refers to the number of participants or observations included in a study. This number is usually represented by n. The size of a sample influences two statistical properties: 1) the precision of our estimates and 2) the power of the study to draw conclusions.

What is bad about small sample size? ›

If we pick a small sample, we run a greater risk of the small sample being unusual just by chance. Choosing 5 people to represent the entire U.S., even if they are chosen completely at random, will often result if a sample that is very unrepresentative of the population.

Does sample size affect bias? ›

Increasing the sample size tends to reduce the sampling error; that is, it makes the sample statistic less variable. However, increasing sample size does not affect survey bias. A large sample size cannot correct for the methodological problems (undercoverage, nonresponse bias, etc.) that produce survey bias.

What does it mean if a study is underpowered? ›

An underpowered study does not have a sufficiently large sample size to answer the research question of interest. An overpowered study has too large a sample size and wastes resources.

Is 10 respondents enough for qualitative research? ›

Actually the beauty of qualitative research is to find an answer for 'WHY' & on the other hand quantitative study would respond to 'WHAT', although views varies from researcher to researcher still at least 10 respondents in each category/sample is needed for qualitative study.

How many participants are involved in qualitative research? ›

Ensuring you've hit the right number of participants

In The logic of small samples in interview-based, authors Mira Crouch and Heather McKenzie note that using fewer than 20 participants during a qualitative research study will result in better data.

Why are there 5 participants in qualitative research? ›

That the probability of someone encountering an issue is 31%

Based on these assumptions, Jakob Nielsen and Tom Landauer built a mathematical model that shows that, by doing a qualitative test with 5 participants, you will identify 85% of the issues in an interface.

Is 100 a good sample size for qualitative research? ›

Another guide for good sample size suggests : 50 as very poor; 100 as poor, 200 as fair, 300 as good, 500 as very good and 1000 as excellent (Comrey and Lee, 1992; Tabacnik and Fidell, 1996; Vanvoorhis and Morgan, 2007).

Is 20 a good sample size for qualitative research? ›

Sample Size for Qualitative Studies

Need to ensure there is enough, but not too much, data (>30 too large; Boddy, 2016). One review identified that samples of 20 and 30 (and multiples of 10) were most common (Mason, 2010), with 25-30 being a typical recommendation (Dworkin, 2012).

What is enough sample size? ›

For populations under 1,000, a minimum ratio of 30 percent (300 individuals) is advisable to ensure representativeness of the sample. For larger populations, such as a population of 10,000, a comparatively small minimum ratio of 10 percent (1,000) of individuals is required to ensure representativeness of the sample.

Why is 30 the minimum sample size? ›

A sample size of 30 often increases the confidence interval of your population data set enough to warrant assertions against your findings. 4 The higher your sample size, the more likely the sample will be representative of your population set.

Why is a small sample size bad in qualitative research? ›

A sample size that is too small reduces the power of the study and increases the margin of error, which can render the study meaningless. Researchers may be compelled to limit the sampling size for economic and other reasons.

What is the minimum sample size for quantitative research? ›

If the research has a relational survey design, the sample size should not be less than 30. Causal-comparative and experimental studies require more than 50 samples. In survey research, 100 samples should be identified for each major sub-group in the population and between 20 to 50 samples for each minor sub-group.

How many questions should you ask in a qualitative interview? ›

Do not ask more than one question at a time. The best questions are those which elicit the longest answers from the respondent. Do not ask questions that can be answered with one word. Don't ask questions that require your respondents to do your analysis for you.

Is 6 respondents enough for qualitative research? ›

Since Guest et al.'s publication in 2006, other researchers have confirmed that 6-12 interviews seem to be a sweet spot for the number of qualitative interviews needed to reach saturation.

How many testers do you need to solve 85% of problems? ›

Spend this budget on 3 studies with 5 users each!

After the first study with five participants has found 85% of the usability problems, you will want to fix these problems in a redesign.

How many respondents should a study have? ›

As a rule of thumb, one should use multiplier of minimum five to determine the sample size i.e. if you are having 30 questions in your questionnaire multiply it with 5 = 150 responses (minimum).

What is considered a small sample size? ›

Although one researcher's “small” is another's large, when I refer to small sample sizes I mean studies that have typically between 5 and 30 users total—a size very common in usability studies.

What sample size do I need for 95 confidence? ›

To be 95% confident that the true value of the estimate will be within 5 percentage points of 0.5, (that is, between the values of 0.45 and 0.55), the required sample size is 385. This is the number of actual responses needed to achieve the stated level of accuracy.

What is considered a large sample size? ›

Often a sample size is considered “large enough” if it's greater than or equal to 30, but this number can vary a bit based on the underlying shape of the population distribution. In particular: If the population distribution is symmetric, sometimes a sample size as small as 15 is sufficient.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Neely Ledner

Last Updated:

Views: 5470

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (62 voted)

Reviews: 85% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Neely Ledner

Birthday: 1998-06-09

Address: 443 Barrows Terrace, New Jodyberg, CO 57462-5329

Phone: +2433516856029

Job: Central Legal Facilitator

Hobby: Backpacking, Jogging, Magic, Driving, Macrame, Embroidery, Foraging

Introduction: My name is Neely Ledner, I am a bright, determined, beautiful, adventurous, adventurous, spotless, calm person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.